Skip to main content

Supreme Court tells RBI "Extension of time given to borrowers not viable" Loan moratorium scheme

 

Loan moratorium scheme: Extension of time given to borrowers not viable, RBI tells Supreme Court

The central bank said it had already issued a framework on August 6 with the aim of facilitating the revival of real sector activities and helping borrowers.

The Reserve Bank of India on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that it was not viable to extend the loan moratorium period, The Hindu reported.

A three-judge bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan continued hearing pleas against the Reserve Bank of India’s decision to charge interest on term loans during the moratorium period announced due to the coronavirus pandemic. The pleas have been filed by industry, real estate and power sectors.

Advocate V Giri, appearing for the central bank, referred to clause 3 of its August 6 circular for “resolution framework for Covid-19-related stress”, a debt resolution plan for corporate and personal loans. He said that lending institutions, guided by their respective board-approved policy, would prepare viable resolution plans for eligible borrowers. But lenders would ensure that this resolution was provided only to the borrowers stressed on account of the pandemic, Giri added.

The bank said borrowers needed to “only invoke their interest” in the benefits enumerated under the circular. “So, borrowers have to only come and say that they want to take the benefit of the RBI circular of August 6,” the bench asked.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, suggested that the central bank should once again clarify the contents of the circular for the benefit of borrowers.

The RBI told the court it had issued the framework of August 6 with the aim of facilitating the revival of real sector activities and mitigating the impact on the ultimate borrowers, which were financially affected due to Covid-19.

The court scheduled the case for further hearing on December 14.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court had said that it would not pass any order that may risk the economy going “haywire”.

This came after Solicitor General Mehta told the court that a blanket waiver of loans on debts incurred by all borrowers would deeply impact the economy as it would mean forgoing an estimated over Rs 6 lakh crore. “If the banks were to bear this burden, it would necessarily wipe out a substantial and a major part of their net worth, rendering most of the banks unviable and raising a very serious question mark over their very survival”, he had submitted.

To this, Justice Bhushan had responded: “Of course the court will not pass an order which will lead to the economy going haywire. We are conscious of the fact,” according to Live Law.

Loan moratorium

Considering the economic impact of the lockdown imposed to fight the coronavirus crisis, the Reserve Bank of India had on March 27 said that banks would be allowed to grant a moratorium of three months on payment of all installments due between March 1 and May 31. On May 23, it said that banks can extend the moratorium until August 31. However, the RBI had said it would be imprudent to go for a forced waiver of interest, risking the financial viability of the banks it was mandated to regulate and putting the interests of the depositors in jeopardy.

In August, the Centre said the loan moratorium scheme can be extended by a period of two years after the top court had criticised the Centre for “hiding behind the RBI” without making its stand clear on the loan moratorium.

On October 14, the top court refused to allow the Centre a month’s time to implement the interest waiver on loans of up to Rs 2 crore. It directed that the execution of waiver should be done by November 2. The government claimed that the deadline for providing relief to borrowers was November 15.

The Centre had submitted an affidavit to the court on October 9, in which it said that it was not possible to provide more relief to different sectors affected by the coronavirus crisis. The Centre had even then said that “courts should not interfere in fiscal policy”. The Reserve Bank of India had also told the Supreme Court that it was not possible to extend the moratorium beyond six months.

On November 19, the Centre had again appealed to the Supreme Court not to intervene and give more relief to borrowers as the government was already dealing with it.

Popular posts from this blog

Rajinikanth age 70 Ahead Of Party Launch

  AIADMK's O Panneerselvam and composer AR Rahman among early wishers. Chennai:  Tamil actor and aspiring politician Rajinikanth celebrates his 70th birthday today, only weeks ahead of the launch of his political party on December 31, making it a momentous occasion not merely for the movie icon but also for Tamil Nadu and Indian national politics. The veteran artist, born Shivaji Rao Gaekwad, had last week announced that he will launch his long-anticipated political party in January, five months before the Tamil Nadu election in 2021. This gives the actor's 70th birthday a whole new ring of excitement. His fans had begun assembling before his residence in Chennai this morning, holding banners and sporting T-shirts printed with his photographs. A number of them, especially those associated with the Rajini Makkal Manram, a forum of the star's fans, will be involved in charity work to mark the day like they do every year. Meanwhile, early this morning, Prime Minister Narendra

Adani shares slump after freeze placed on foreign funds

The NSDL has frozen the accounts of Albula Investment Fund, Cresta Fund and APMS Investment Fund, its website shows without citing a reason for the freeze. Shares of Adani group companies fell by about 5% to 25% on Monday after the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) froze the accounts of three foreign funds that are among the top stakeholders in the firms. Adani Enterprises, the conglomerate’s flagship company, plunged as much as 25%, its steepest fall in nearly a decade. Nifty 50-listed Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone fell as much as 19% before paring some losses. The NSDL has frozen the accounts of Albula Investment Fund, Cresta Fund and APMS Investment Fund, its website shows without citing a reason for the freeze. Reuters was unable to reach the funds for comment. It was not immediately clear if the funds had functioning websites. The three funds feature among the top twelve investors and owned about 2.1% to 8.91% stakes in five Adani Group companies as of March 31, 20

UEFA Euro 2020 Live Score, Turkey vs Wales Updates: Determined Turkey Face Unchanged Wales

  UEFA Euro 2020 Live Score, Turkey vs Wales Updates:  Wales are bracing for a hostile reception as they face Turkey in Baku. Wales is unchanged as Turkey made two changes from their previous game. Kaan Ayhan coming in for Merih Demiral and Cengiz Under replacing Yusuf Yazici. Italy can seal their place in the last-16 with victory against Switzerland after Aleksei Miranchuk   scored a beautiful goal to give   Russia the win against Finland at the  Saint Petersburg Stadium . Joel Pohjanpalo scored but a VAR check showed he was offside. Mario Fernandes was taken to the hospital after his fall as Russia confirmed a spinal injury. A goal in first-half stoppage time by Aleksei Miranchuk got Russia’s  Euro  2020  campaign back on track as they beat Finland 1-0 in Group B on Wednesday. Joel Pohjanpalo thought he had given the Finns the lead in the fifth minute but his powerful header was ruled out for offside after a VAR review, and the rest of the first half was played at a high tempo. With